creating a new social norm for hearing care
You are here:Home»Articles»Why we must never use the ‘S’ word
Monday, 24 October 2011 21:53

Why we must never use the ‘S’ word

Written by

socks-in-bedImagine for a moment that you come across an interview with someone who says, “We want to remove the stigma associated with wearing socks in bed.”

What runs through your mind?

 

The Effect of Using the ‘S’ Word

Up until that moment, you may not have realised that there even was a stigma associated with wearing socks in bed. In other words, wearing socks has now been labelled as having a stigma.

Next, because the human brain likes to create meaning by filling in gaps, you find yourself working out why that stigma might exist. Even though the interview doesn't provide these details, your own imagination begins filling in the gaps: Maybe it's to do with feet getting too hot (and sweaty… eugh!). Or that people are wearing the same socks they went to work with (do they ever change them?). Maybe people see it as a bit ‘fuddy-duddy’...

Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, you (the reader) are now less likely to wear socks in bed.

In other words, by aspiring to change people's attitudes to wearing socks in bed, the interviewee has reinforced the very same attitude they wanted to remove!

Even more damaging, they have unwittingly helped to spread that unhelpful attitude to a brand new audience, who up until the moment they read those words, never even thought there might be something wrong with wearing socks in bed.

So by declaring you want to remove the stigma, you end up spreading it. The 'S' word is like a virus.

The solution? Don't ever use the ‘S’ word if you want to change people's attitudes.

Change the Label, Change the Reaction

The ‘S’ word is a type of label, and labels are very powerful linguistic devices. We use them all the time as mental shortcuts to automatically bring up associated thoughts and feelings with a single word or phrase. So we have to be careful how we use them, and if they're bringing up unhelpful associations, we need to change our label.

A recent example of this is how supermarkets are changing from selling “vegetarian” dishes to “meat-free” dishes. It's the same product, but the label's different. The reason? Vegetarianism represents only six percent of the market, and the concept is apparently seen as having “negative or outdated connotations”. Meat-free, on the other hand, is more universal and is seen as associated with healthy eating. Change the label, and you change the reaction. Source: Daily Telegraph, 16 January 2011

The same applies to the use of labels in hearing care, including the ‘S’ word.

Misconceptions regarding the ‘S’ word

Some might argue that they're only reflecting what they see the reality as being. But this thinking represents a total misunderstanding about how attitudes are shaped. To shape attitudes, you have to model what you want the attitude to be, rather than say how it currently is.

If you simply say how it currently is, it will continue for as long as you say it exists because you are setting up your own vicious cycle. So if you say, “We want to remove the stigma associated with hearing loss,” you will perpetuate its existence.

What we should say instead

So what do we say instead? How can we change the label to change the reaction?

It's actually very easy. Instead of the ‘S’ word, you simply use the terms: “outdated attitudes” or “outdated ideas” or “outdated misconceptions”, or anything else with the word “outdated” in it.

By using the word “outdated” we are labelling wrong attitudes as “behind the times” (which they are). In other words we are saying to people that if they think negatively about hearing care, it is likely that it's because they are remembering what things used to be like, rather than what they are now. So we are effectively saying to them, take a fresh look.

Remember earlier we said that the human brain likes to create meaning by filling in the gaps? So if someone hears the word “outdated”, they will begin asking themselves why they are behind the times. We trigger a thought process for them that begins to automatically modernise their attitudes.

So if a patient, a client, a member of the public, a colleague, or even the media say to you, “There's still a stigma associated with hearing aids,” your reply needs to be along the lines of:

“Do you think that's really true? Or do you think that some people are just behind the times?”

By saying this, you are labelling 'some people' (i.e. not everyone) as behind the times. Your audience is unlikely to want to see themselves as being amongst “some people” who are ignorant enough to be ‘behind the times’, and is far more likely to see themselves as agreeing with you; after all, you're the expert.

And for wearers of hearing aids, we are giving them a very powerful new identity: by using hearing aids they are amongst those in the know, and are therefore leading the way in modernising attitudes to hearing care. Their attitude will affect others, which in turn will affect others. And in this way, we leave the 'outdated attitudes' behind.

But whatever we do, we must promise hearing aid users everywhere that we'll never again use the 'S' word in regards to hearing care. After all, we wouldn't want to be the ones who turn out to have been perpetuating those outdated attitudes all this time.

Read 9547 times
Curtis Alcock

Curtis J. Alcock is Founder of Audira » Think Tank for Hearing.

He was involved in design and marketing for 12 years before making the transition into hearing care nearly 12 years ago. He now runs an independent family-run hearing care practice in the United Kingdom and has spoken internationally on shaping the future of hearing care.

Login to post comments